About Artificial Intelligence, Again

Excerpt from upcoming book: Conspiracy 201: Knee Deep in the Conspiratorium.

By John P. Smith

Apocalypse Watch Editor

    I used several flavors of AI for the research in the book to make sure I have the basic facts straight: Dates and locations. That kind of thing. In almost all things, the AI, collectively and individually, support the official narrative. You’d think if they just reported the facts, they wouldn’t have an opinion. But they do: Their dialog supports the official narrative and their reporting of alternative viewpoints comes complete with undisguised scorn for people who believe anything other than the official position. (Or, maybe I’m just reading it that way…but I don’t think so.) 

    I love AI as a tool. I used the analogy earlier that it’s like using a chainsaw instead of an axe. It’s fantastically science-fictiony to have the Library of Congress and every expert in the world on just about everything just a few keystrokes away. What would have taken weeks, months or even years to research three decades ago, now only takes a matter of seconds. Just like the axe and the chainsaw: A good chainsaw operator can cut more trees into firewood in one day than a woodsman with an axe can in a week. (Probably more, if I’m running that axe.) Allow me to perpetuate a tired cliché: With great power, comes great responsibility. A maniac with a chainsaw can also do a hell of a lot more damage than an equally motivated nutcase with an axe.

    What can AI do now that’s dangerous? Access your bank accounts, credit cards and financial investments? Well, yes. AI can bankrupt anyone in a cashless society in a matter of seconds. Can AI SWAT you? Well, yeah. Can AI revoke your driver’s license and issue a bench warrant for your arrest? Well, yeah. Can AI cancel your insurance and notify the police. Well, yep. Would AI know any of these actions were wrong? Well, no. The AI would have to be programmed to know how to do those things and wherever that programming originated, it’s a good bet avarice, malfeasance, control or manipulation top the list of reasons it was coded that way.

    Which begs the question: Coded that way by whom? All the AI available in 2025 are created by big tech, left-leaning, government-approved developers; people who work for and with the government, hand-in-hand with the criminal media. No way they’d get their government subsidies and grants if they refused to push the social and political agendas of the people with the money. The code is weighted to spew out agenda-driven answers even when data to the contrary is easily available. Test it yourself; don’t take my word for it. If we ask the AI to give us the top 3 reasons for something, it weighs scientific papers over news reporting. Then again, news reporting from the New York Times or Washington Post is more likely to be regurgitated as an answer than a contradictory article from the Heber Springs, Ark., Sun-Times. This is still the way it is done, even though in the last 10 years, we know scientific papers and peer-reviewed journals have been compromised by politics and money. We are well aware the NYT and WP dropped the pretense of real journalism in 2016 and have repeatedly been caught publishing misinformation, disinformation and outright fabrication to smear the political rivals of their financial and political backers. We all know they can’t be trusted; yet their views and reports are given precedence by the AI. That’s by design, because their reporting pushes the narrative of the people with the money. 

    Let’s back up for a minute and cover some basics: I see the biggest fear of AI being that we’re not sure what it can do yet. We’re just scratching the surface. Over the last 40 years, I’ve programmed calculators, computers, robots, CNC mills, CNC lathes, Coordinate Measuring Machines, precision inspection equipment, controllers, and probably things I don’t even remember. My experience tells me that getting a computer to do any actual physical work in the real world takes more than just programming: It involves communication, calibration, location, sensors, interfaces and, significantly, power. Remember, through all of this, if AI starts getting out of control, we can always pull the plug. If we’re afraid we might have a fight with AI in the future, then we better have an manual disconnect before we interconnect.

    What do we do? Do we shackle the AI to only work on approved projects? Who does the shackling and who approves the projects? Do we limit the reach of the AI? Who decides how far it can go and who draws the line? AI being limited to tasks only approved by those in power is not a win. That’s what we’re dealing with already, and the field is in its infancy. 

What is the Conspiratorium?

By John P. Smith
Apocalypse Watch Editor

An auditorium is typically a big room where civilized folks gather for lectures, shows, or meetings: A tidy little echo chamber for approved ideas. But the Conspiratorium? That's the exact opposite: a wild, uncontrolled, chaotic mess; basically an open field drowning in flung facts, lobbed theories, and blasts of pure weirdness from a gigantic confetti cannon. Picture the muddy turf of a Woodstock littered with a million half-baked crazy notions and rogue thoughts, just waiting for any random passerby to scoop one up and hurl it back into the melee for the crowd to bobble like an explosive beachball. It's like a massive, no-rules game of catch where the ball could be anything from lizard people pulling the strings of civilization to hysterical rants by people who assure us the Earth is flat. The players range from obvious lunatics, out-right crazy, foaming at the mouth liberals, to those stone-cold logicians who drop ideas backed by what they swear are ironclad facts; that often turn out to be cherry-picked or straight-up fabricated.

Naturally, this glorious dumpster fire is the lovechild of the internet era. What could possibly go wrong with giving everyone a megaphone? Barely three decades back, conspiracy culture (a term that came into common use in the early 2000s) was confined to sad little huddles of disenchanted, but enlightened, social outcasts in dingy coffee shops, sketchy bars, smoke-choked backrooms, or creepy remote cabins. Back then, they'd whisper about how "the Jews run the world" or some shadowy cabal plotting a one-world government. Sadly, the subject matter hasn't evolved a lot; it's just migrated to flat screens and scroll feeds.

Compare that to your standard auditorium's structured snooze-fest; ideas doled out in neat lines, moderated by some authority figure, and passively digested by an audience fighting to stay awake. Thanks to the web, conspiracy talk has been democratized, morphing those once-shadowy whispers into screaming, globe-spanning tantrums. Now, any keyboard warrior can jump in, hype up the nonsense, or play armchair debunker, the whole process creating a swirling vortex of great ideas, wild imagination, dubious facts, wild-eyed fantasy, and doomsday dreams.

The Conspiratorium today is a vibrant, and volatile, open-air festival where actual truth bombs bump uglies with fan-fiction in a public toilet while delusion and extremism watch from the stall on the end; the ultimate snapshot of modern communication. In the Conspiratorium, you've got access to it all; but can you believe it? That’s the real trick, isn’t it?

Apocalypse Watch E207: The "No Indictments" Prediction Episode

Indictments for Epstein, Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Clinton, and Comey?

Don’t Hold Your Breath

    Tonight’s Apocalypse Watch E207: The "No Indictments" Prediction Episode on Rumble dives into the swirling conspiracies around Jeffrey Epstein, Barack Obama, John Clapper, John Brennan, Hillary Clinton, and James Comey. Host Johnny Watcher, a military-trained journalist from northern Arkansas, and the Apocalypse Watch crew predict no indictments are coming, expecting the same lackluster “investigative” circus we saw with Epstein’s case; lots of noise, no justice. For the Conspiratorium, let’s unpack why indictments are unlikely, how this ties to suppressed truths like the COVID lab leak or Hunter Biden’s laptop, and why the system keeps protecting its own.

The No-Indictments Prediction

    The Apocalypse Watch gang argues that despite Tulsi Gabbard’s bombshell claims as Director of National Intelligence, alleging Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, Clinton, and others orchestrated a “treasonous conspiracy” to falsely tie Trump to Russia in 2016 will result in no indictments. Why? The Epstein case sets the precedent: high-profile names, damning allegations, but zero accountability. Epstein’s 2019 death, ruled a suicide, left questions unanswered, with subpoenas for Clinton and top Dems in 2025 yielding no charges yet.

    Similarly, Gabbard’s declassified 2016 memos and 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) point to manipulation, but betting sites like Polymarket give Obama a mere 3–6% chance of indictment in 2025, with no odds for Clapper, Brennan, or Comey. X engagement farmers and MAGA sycophants push for treason charges, but skeptics like us call it a pipe dream.

Why No Movement?

    First, legal barriers: Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381) requires overt acts aiding an enemy with two witnesses or a confession; tough to prove for the Russia Hoax. Gabbard’s evidence, the rushed ICA, Steele dossier use, etc., shows political bias but not criminal intent. Statutes of limitations, five years for most federal crimes, may bar prosecution for 2016–2017 acts.

Next, Deep State protection: The Apocalypse Watch crew sees a pattern: just as fact-checkers dismissed the COVID lab leak as a conspiracy, though it was later deemed “most likely” by the FBI, or labeled Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian disinformation, the system shields elites. Epstein’s case, with its talking heads, media days and Fox News segments eventually produced no convictions. This "conspiracy" mirrors the Epstein Fiasco, as does the DOJ’s slow-walking of Bondi’s strike force probing Brennan and Comey.

Finally, Political Theater: The establishment, including Brennan and Clapper’s New York Times defense, claims the ICA was legit, backed by Mueller’s report. This narrative is similar to the media dismissing vaccine myocarditis risks after the vaccine rollout, which was later confirmed by CDC, keeps the focus on optics, not justice.

Ramifications of No Indictments

Let's face some facts: We distrust the media and the "government" in general. Now we've got more concrete proof the system is rigged. When elites like Epstein or Obama skate free, public faith in justice crumbles. It's the very definition of deep-state cover-up. When we ask why the cover up, the answers are disturbing. The deep state, Intelligence Community and embedded bureaucrats are still running things. Trump only thinks he's the President and Pam Bondi is powerless inside her own Justice Department.

Watch Apocalypse Watch E207 on Rumble: (https://rumble.com/v6x6z8u-apocalypse-watch-e207-the-no-indictments-prediction-episode..html)