Saturday, March 14, 2015

Trying to Make Recording Police Illegal


Just a heads-up to everyone:  Texas is trying to make recording police illegal.  Oh, sure, the legislation only keeps people back a "safe" distance...for now.   And, they're not saying who is made safe by keeping people with recorders back from a police activity -- citizens or cops?  The report below is from the Huffington Post in italics:  [My commentary is in brackets.]
From the Huff Post:  A bill introduced in the Texas House of Representatives would make it illegal for private citizens to record police within 25 feet.  House Bill 2918, introduced by state Rep. Jason Villalba (R-Dallas) on Tuesday, would make the offense a misdemeanor. Citizens who are armed would not be permitted to record police activity within 100 feet of an officer, according to the Houston Chronicle.  [Not only would this keep private citizens back outside of audio recording range, it pushes anyone able to defend him- or herself out four times that far. Someone able to defend himself = someone more likely to record police abuse of power.]
Only representatives of radio or TV organizations that hold an FCC license, newspapers and magazines would have the right to record police.  [This really cuts to it, doesn't it?  Government has been pushing for this for some time; they hate bloggers, freelancers and media they can't control.  So to fix that major malfunction that keeps letting the truth out: "If you want to record us, you have to be licensed by us.  Oh, yeah, and if you screw with us, we'll pull your license..."]
The legislator disagreed with people on Twitter who said he's seeking to make all filming of cops illegal. [It's getting a foot in the door.  We all know how government works in these cases: Give them an inch; they put you in jail for obstruction and bust down the door.]
"My bill ... just asks filmers to stand back a little so as not to interfere with law enforcement," Villalba tweeted.  [Idiot pawn.]
The bill would go against precedent set in 2011 by an appeals court, which found that citizens are allowed to record police, according to the ACLU. Villalba's bill comes at a time of increased public scrutiny over the police killings of Michael Brown, Eric Garner and others. In Garner's case, a grand jury didn't indict the police officer who put Garner in a chokehold before his death, but another grand jury did indict the man who filmed the incident on weapons charges.  [The cop in the Garner case was guilty as hell.  And they did bust the guy who put the murder on the internet for, depending on which news source you believe, weapons charges -- which he denies.
Last year, HuffPost reporter Ryan J. Reilly and another reporter were detained and assaulted while attempting to film a swarm of police officers filling up a McDonald's in Ferguson, Missouri, the town where Brown was killed. That filming, as well as other recordings of police interactions by the public, are currently legal.  [A lot of people recording the stupidity in Ferguson were detained by cops.  And a lot of people weren't.  When the recorders need to come out, there's safety in numbers; they can't get all of us without getting one of us first -- while the rest of us upload data!]
Any blogger, alternative media producer, freelance writer who has a clue as to the chokehold government and industry have on mainstream media had to know this was coming.   The powers that be in government and industry hate media the can't control.  If they had their way, we'd be printing pamphlets on ditto machines and that would be illegal, too.
They want us to have a license to be "media."  Without a "license" any producer of content would be barred from making any profit on their content.  No selling, no advertising revenue, no royalties.  That sucks for those who make money off their content; what about those of us who don't?  It says it right in the Huff Post story; you don't have a license, you can't record police.  We have to assume that photography, audio recording and good, old-fashioned eye-witness reporting would also be covered and that, once it becomes law, Google (or your choice of net portal) will be compelled to take down your evil, untruthful news reports if you are posting without a license, Think this all sounds far-fetched and paranoid?  Think again. 
I also posted this article on my website:  www.good-cop-bad-cop.com  This site is still in the development stages, but I'm trying to add enough content to start generating interest in the concept...which is that everyone, all the time, record cops when performing their public duties in public.
The concept is actually laid out in this website (also mine):  www.goodcopbadcop.info  The idea is that any time one has an interaction with a cop, it's recorded, via portable app maybe, and is stored in the interaction database, accessible online and via portable app.  So, when dealing with a cop, a user can have a good idea whether he's one of the good guys or one of the bad guys.  They keep track of us; so we'll keep track of them. 
Right now, it's not illegal to record them...
Please comment and let me know what you think of these ideas.  




The Rh Phenotype and Nazi Atrocities in WWII

The Rh Phenotype and Nazi Atrocities in WWII

Short answer: Rh- was NOT a factor


By John P. Smith
Freelance Writer


(Recently I was asked to look into the whether or not the Nazi war machine was targeting populations based on blood type and Rh-factor rather than, or in addition to, race or ethnicity in connection with the Vril Society. Below is the what I've been able to put together in about a week.)

After much YouTube and Google searching, none of which produced a hit for searches such as “Rh factor and the Nazi Holocaust,”  I decided to put it together myself.  I found sites that detailed the Rh phenotype and how it is distributed among world populations.  Next, I looked up groups of people the Nazis targeted for their genocide programs.  As always, I try to multiple source any findings.

Based on the research below, I can’t see any direct connection, or even an emerging pattern, between the Rh factor and the Nazi atrocities of WWII.  The Ukrainians, Poles, Czech, Etc., have average incidence of Rh-negative in their general populations and they were targeted just like the Jews.  In fact, the Jews have only slightly more than half the average incidence of Rh- and they were the (alleged) primary target of the Nazi killing machine.  The Nazis really didn't like anybody different: Some of the Germans and Austrians who had lived abroad for a significant proportion of their lives were also deemed to have too much exposure to foreign ideas; many were put into concentration camps. These prisoners were called "Emigrants" and marked with a blue triangle.”

On the surface, it appears the Nazi’s were a cult of giant assholes who persecuted Jews because they were Jewish, blacks because they were black, Russians because they were Russian.  They seemed to be fair and equitable in their hatred of just about every other culture.  Though, oddly, they did not persecute the Japanese or the Chinese because of their rich cultural pasts.  (Coincidentally, both those cultures have a well-below-average incidence of Rh-.)  Nor does the data work the other way:  The Germans have average occurrence of Rh-negative in their population.  They do not appear to have been trying to establish Rh- as the dominant phenotype.

If the data is real, and I see no reason to believe it to be fabricated, then it was not Rh- that was the driving force behind their racial hatred.  In fact, the Nazi’s were already well into their conquer and kill spree before the Rh factor was even discovered.  “The Rh, or rhesus, factor was discovered in 1940 by K. Landsteiner (Austrian Jew) and A. S. Wiener (American, New York), when they observed that an injection of blood from a rhesus monkey into rabbits caused an antigenic reaction in the serum component of rabbit blood (see immunity).” -- InfoPlease



I have not finished reading, or completed listening to the book, The Coming Race.  But I have it in the queue. Where the Vril society might be connected with the Rh- factor has to do with the theory that those with Rh-negative blood are, let's say, more-descended from aliens, or other non-humans, than from earth-normal primates, as is indicated in Rh-positive individuals. Myth and legend have the Vril-ya living in the center of the earth (Baron Lytton's book) or inhabiting planets in the Aldebaran star system (Maria Osric's telepathic communication.)

Whatever their origins, myth, legend, theory, or otherwise, the Nazis did, in fact, put a lot of effort into tapping into the Vril energy source. The Vril Society was real, as was the Thule Society, in Nazi Germany. However, I see no connection between the Vril Society, their work in trying to tap into the Vril energy source, nor with the Vril as a race interbreeding with humans to produce Rh-negative humans and the idea that the Nazis used the Rh-phenotype as a sorting factor for hate killings.

VRIL -- Video -- I watched these: A lot of overlap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMR_Oj6Qrs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNiZGM1PmR4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDFEwIXlrss


The link below is interesting.  The video is short.  Maria Osric was the medium who received the information and instructions from Aldebaran for the Vril Society.  Some have made the connection between Osric and Semjase, who is the alien teacher of UFO photographer Billy Meier.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZdup3bBrNI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ClUzn7FKnU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk75QtxSYwY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzWHqooAJtM

VRIL -- Reading -- I read these:






RH Factor reading:  I read these.


http://disinfome.proboards.com/thread/53

http://humansarefree.com/2014/07/does-rh-negative-blood-type-equal-alien.html

Interesting stuff in this one -- space weapon? -- A tangent from the Rh- research brought about by the (dubious) connection to Vril aircraft: Whoever posted some of the videos above used the term “Hannebu Vril” in the title to attract people searching for the connection, just as I was.  That research led to -- or originated from, depending on which direction the search starts -- the Martyn Stubbs space phenomena videos of discs in space as well as Admiral Richard Byrd and the hollow earth theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdfFno_wh7w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1RWxKop0Pw


Rh- Personality:  My “A-negative” answers...


As I am of blood type A-negative, I decided to see how well I fit the "stereotypical" mold for Rh-negative individuals.


YES o A feeling of not belonging
YES o Truth seekers
YES o Sense of a "Mission" in life
YES o Empathy & Compassion for Mankind
IDK o An extra rib or vertebra.
YES o Higher than average IQ
IDK o ESP Ability
YES o Love of Space & Science
NO  o More sensitive vision & other senses.
IDK o Increased of psychic/intuitive abilities
IDK o Cannot be cloned
NO  o Lower body temperature
LOWER  o Higher blood pressure (some say lower)
YES o Predominantly blue, green, or Hazel eyes
NO  o Red or reddish tint to hair color
NO  o Increased sensitivity to heat & sunlight
??? o Unexplained Scares (NOTE: May mean Scars, but this is how the list was printed)
??? o Piercing Eyes
NO  o Tend to be Healers
NO  o Empathetic Illnesses
NO  o Ability to disrupt electrical devices
NO! o Prone to Alien Abductions
YES o Experience unexplained phenomenon
IDK o Psychic Dreams and/or Ability

Nazi Holocaust Targets:



In addition to Jews and Romani (of whom approximately 1.5 million were killed), the targeted groups also included Ukrainians (approximately 3 million were killed), Poles (2.5 million) and other Slavic peoples; Soviets (particularly prisoners of war) and others who did not belong to the Aryan Herrenvolk (Master Race) such as people with mental disorders, the deaf, the physically disabled, those with learning disabilities; gay men (and occasionally lesbians), transgender people; political opponents (such as communists, trade unionists, social democrats, socialists,anarchists and others with left-wing political views); and religious dissidents such as the Jehovah's Witnesses.[2][3] Taking into account all of the victims of Nazi persecution, they systematically killed an estimated 6 million Jews and mass murdered an additional 11 million people during the war. Donald Niewyk suggests that the broadest definition, including Soviet civilian deaths would produce a death toll of 17 million.[4]
Despite often widely varying treatment (some groups were actively targeted for genocide, while others were not), these victims all perished alongside one another, some in concentration camps such as Dachau and, some as victims of other forms of Nazi brutality, but most in death camps, such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, according to the extensive documentation left behind by the Nazis themselves (both written and photographed), eyewitness testimony (by survivors, perpetrators, and bystanders) and the statistical records of the various countries under occupation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

Another Source:

Ukrainians   5.5 - 7 million
Jews (of all countries) 6 million +    
Russian POWs 3.3 million +  
Russian Civilians    2 million +    
Poles    3 million +    
Yugoslavians 1.5 million +  
Gypsies 200,000 - 500,000      
Mentally/Physically Disabled 70,000- 250,000
Homosexuals Tens of thousands      
Spanish Republicans Tens of thousands      
Jehovah's Witnesses 2,500 - 5,000
Catholic Priests 2,600


Blood Types & Peoples



(in percentages)Distribution by blood type:




Distribution by Country, Type and Rh


Country
Population[1]
O+
A+
B+
AB+
O−
A−
B−
AB−
Australia[2]
21,262,641
40.0%
31.0%
8.0%
2.0%
9.0%
7.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Austria[3]
8,210,281
30.0%
33.0%
12.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
3.0%
1.0%
Belgium[4]
10,414,336
38.0%
34.0%
8.5%
4.1%
7.0%
6.0%
1.5%
0.8%
Brazil[5]
198,739,269
36.0%
34.0%
8.0%
2.5%
9.0%
8.0%
2.0%
0.5%
Canada[6]
33,487,208
39.0%
36.0%
7.6%
2.5%
7.0%
6.0%
1.4%
0.5%
China[7]
1,339,724,852
47.7%
27.8%
18.9%
5.0%
0.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0.03%
Czech Republic[8]
10,532,770
27.0%
36.0%
15.0%
7.0%
5.0%
6.0%
3.0%
1.0%
Denmark[9]
5,500,510
35.0%
37.0%
8.0%
4.0%
6.0%
7.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Estonia[10]
1,315,819
29.5%
30.8%
20.7%
6.3%
4.3%
4.5%
3.0%
0.9%
Finland[11]
5,250,275
27.0%
38.0%
15.0%
7.0%
4.0%
6.0%
2.0%
1.0%
France[12]
62,150,775
36.0%
37.0%
9.0%
3.0%
6.0%
7.0%
1.0%
1.0%
Germany
82,329,758
35.0%
37.0%
9.0%
4.0%
6.0%
6.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Iceland[13]
306,694
47.6%
26.4%
9.3%
1.6%
8.4%
4.6%
1.7%
0.4%
Ireland[14]
4,203,200
47.0%
26.0%
9.0%
2.0%
8.0%
5.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Israel[15]
7,233,701
32.0%
34.0%
17.0%
7.0%
3.0%
4.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Japan[16]
127,368,088
29.9%
39.8%
19.9%
9.9%
0.15%
0.2%
0.1%
0.05%
Korea[7]
73,000,000
36.6%
32.8%
21.0%
9.0%
0.4%
0.2%
0.09%
0.03%
Netherlands[17]
16,715,999
39.5%
35.0%
6.7%
2.5%
7.5%
7.0%
1.3%
0.5%
New Zealand[18]
4,213,418
38.0%
32.0%
9.0%
3.0%
9.0%
6.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Norway[19]
4,660,539
34.0%
40.8%
6.8%
3.4%
6.0%
7.2%
1.2%
0.6%
Philippines[20]
99,863,000
44-46%
22-23%
24-25%
4-6%
<1 span="">
<1 span="">
<1 span="">
<1 span="">
Poland[21]
38,482,919
31.0%
32.0%
15.0%
7.0%
6.0%
6.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Portugal[22]
10,707,924
36.2%
39.8%
6.6%
2.9%
6.0%
6.6%
1.1%
0.5%
Saudi Arabia[23]
28,686,633
48.0%
24.0%
17.0%
4.0%
4.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.3%
South Africa[24]
49,320,000
39.0%
32.0%
12.0%
3.0%
7.0%
5.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Spain[25]
47,125,002
36.0%
34.0%
8.0%
2.5%
9.0%
8.0%
2.0%
0.5%
Sweden[26]
9,059,651
32.0%
37.0%
10.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Turkey[27]
76,805,524
29.8%
37.8%
14.2%
7.2%
3.9%
4.7%
1.6%
0.8%
United Kingdom[28]
61,113,205
37.0%
35.0%
8.0%
3.0%
7.0%
7.0%
2.0%
1.0%
United States[29]
307,212,123
37.4%
35.7%
8.5%
3.4%
6.6%
6.3%
1.5%
0.6%


2,261,025,244
36.4%
28.3%
20.6%
5.1%
4.3%
3.5%
1.4%
0.5%

 50.0% and above   40.0–49.9%   30.0–39.9%   20.0–29.9%   10.0–19.9%   5.0–9.9%