Monday, November 04, 2019

The Lying Media

The news media is lying to you. They’re lying to me. They’re lying to themselves.
Don't want to believe that you've been lied to, manipulated and controlled?

Here's a list of proven mainstream liberal media lies and blatant misinformation.

It's interesting to note that the misinformation, errors and lies only travel in one direction: They are 100-percent anti-Trump. If these news organizations were fair and unbiased, then the error ratio would, logically, be about 50-percent in favor of Trump. As they are all anti-Trump, we can only conclude that the news organizations are biased. No shocker there.

(I started researching this article and found that Glenn Greenwald had already beat me to it. So several of the short synopsis below are from a piece he wrote about the same subject.)

Remember all these horrifying, frightening, disturbing news scares?

Remember when Russian Hackers took over C-Span? This was a big deal. Russia Today took over C-Span's live feed for about 10 minutes. But...while it did actually happen, it was the result of "an internal routing error" by C-Span and had nothing to do with Russia, Russian Hackers or Russia Today besides the fact that RT is what went out over C-Span because of the "routing error." This happened during the time they were preparing for inauguration coverage. I’m sure this was a legitimate error made by the board operator. (Bullshit!)

Remember when the Russian Hackers took over the Electricity Grid for Vermont and denied heat to U.S. citizens? The Washington Post broke this story, just a couple of weeks before the inauguration. Eventually, this scare and outrage story got diluted down to where it was a piece of malware found on a laptop in no way connected with the electrical grid of any U. S. state and had nothing to do with Russia, Hackers or the election. Eventually, after scaring the shit out of everyone for a week or so, the Washington Post retracted the story because it was complete bullshit.

Remember when the Washington Post published the findings of an Anonymous Group that classified all Right-oriented and Left-critical sites as Russian propaganda? The paper claimed that Russian infiltrators had created and/or edited these sites to spread anti-Democratic propaganda. This went on for several weeks, spreading like a virulent disease through the liberal media with a list of "Russian Blacklist Sites" until...they retracted the story because it was complete bullshit.

Remember when CNN reported Anthony Scramucci was under Senate investigation for being involved in a Russian Direct Investment Fund? It was a big deal; a Trump aide directly associated with Russian money. Except, it wasn't. He wasn't. And it was a made up lie. The three reporters for CNN who "broke" that story, including one Pulitzer Prize winner, were fired. CNN actually apologized to Mr. Scramucci. (Today, I don't think they would even blink an eye at that kind of fabrication. Don Lemon still has a show and all his "news" is made-up bullshit.)

Remember when NBC reported Russian spies attacked U.S. Diplomats at the Cuban Embassy? And they used a sonic microwave superweapon to inflict serious brain damage on U.S. personnel. It was a horrifying and heinous act of war! Until, it wasn't. The whole thing turned out to be a sham. The "brain injuries" were diagnosed by real doctors (neurologists) as collective psychosomatic symptoms. And the strange sounds these "Diplomats" heard leading up the brain injuries was emitted by a common Caribbean cricket. Which is about the same sounds we heard from the media once this was exposed as complete bullshit.

Remember when Slate broke the story of how a Trump organization server was secretly communicating with a Russian bank? This was all the rage and every liberal news organization spewed it with the hateful vitriol only they can generate. And it was the smoking gun that was going to bring out the Russian Collusion proof they all wanted so badly. Except, it wasn't. Again, completely made-up bullshit.

(Anybody else picking up on this pattern?)

Remember when the Guardian broke the story of how Paul Manafort had visited Julian Assange three times while he was a guest at the Ecuadorian Embassy? The Guardian dropped this bombshell about Manafort sneaking into one of the most surveilled buildings in the world. And, instead of fact-checking, all the cable, air and online news outlets dove in head first to expose the Trump/Assange/Russian Collusion connection they all knew existed. Except, it didn't. This story went on for two months without any other news organization ever confirming the "facts." No photo, video or witness evidence ever surfaced. Nor any apology or retraction. One Ecuadorian official from the embassy called the story "a complete fake." You know, made-up bullshit.

Remember when CNN lied to everyone about NOT having as a source one of Michael Cohen's attorneys who admitted to lying about how Cohen would testify to Robert Mueller that President Trump knew in advance about the infamous "Trump Tower meeting?" Wow, that was complicated introduction. CNN finally admitted that their source was, in fact, Lanny Davis, attorney to Michael Cohen. Davis, subsequently admitted the whole thing was a lie. CNN has never retracted the story. Most outlets stopped running with it once it was exposed as complete bullshit.

Remember when BuzzFeed reported that Robert Mueller possessed email and witness testimony proving Trump Directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress? This was, again, the smoking gun all the Trump haters had been waiting for. Except, it wasn't. It was such a blatant lie, that even the hired gun of the liberal left Democratic asshats, Special Counsel Robert Mueller, put out a statement saying that, basically, it was bullshit.

Remember when Congress appointed a Special Counsel to prove that Donald Trump was elected with the help of Russian hackers changing election results? Remember how CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC and every liberal media owned outlet blabbered every day for two years about how this was finally going to be the smoking gun that evicted Trump from the Whitehouse? And, how could we forget the actual outcome? "No evidence of collusion." Of course, the special counsel didn't say he was not guilty. Only that he could find no evidence...after two years and $32 million taxpayer dollars. All we got was bullshit.

Finally, my favorite. Remember how CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC and every liberal media-owned outlet crowed every day for a year that this was going to be the year Hillary Clinton won the Presidency? Remember how they all told us every day, that Hillary was as good as elected; that she had an 80%, or 85%, or 90% lead over Donald Trump? Remember how those lying bastards kept telling us that Trump was joke and Hillary was as good as elected already? I remember it clearly. I also remember driving from Little Rock to Detroit during that time and everywhere I went, I saw 10 Trump/Pence signs for every one Hillary sign.

While I had figured out many years ago that the media is controlled by the CIA (look up Operation Mockingbird; it’s public domain), I concluded the media was lying to me or they were incompetent. They cannot be trusted to tell the truth. They bias their reports intentionally (you know, lie) or they're just too stupid to get it right. Whatever the case; it’s all bullshit.

So, where can we get truthful information? Where can we get unbiased reporting? The answer is easy; nowhere. Not from a single source. Not one single media outlet can be trusted. Understand their history and their bias. Keep front and center the fact that none of them are afraid to report a complete fabrication as long as it makes President Trump look bad. Remember that they have an agenda; they preach the Narrative. The Narrative is what you’re supposed to believe.They want to direct your thoughts and actions to follow the Narrative. (“Here’s what you need to take away from the President’s speech.”) The mainstream media does not want you thinking on your own. Once you understand these things, it’s easier to see the Alternate Narrative.

Look at all of the news outlets, as long as you understand their bias, and make a decision based on your own experience and intuition.

However, to be clear, if your intuition tells you Hillary Clinton was a good pick for President, then you're jacked up worse than a soup sandwich.

Just my opinion. No bullshit.

No comments: