The
news media is lying to you. They’re lying to me. They’re lying to
themselves.
Don't
want to believe that you've been lied to, manipulated and controlled?
Here's
a list of proven mainstream liberal media lies and blatant
misinformation.
It's
interesting to note that the misinformation, errors and lies only
travel in one direction: They are 100-percent anti-Trump. If these
news organizations were fair and unbiased, then the error ratio
would, logically, be about 50-percent in favor of Trump. As they are
all anti-Trump, we can only conclude that the news organizations are
biased. No shocker there.
(I
started researching this article and found that Glenn Greenwald had
already beat me to it. So several of the short synopsis below are
from a piece he wrote about the same subject.)
Remember
all these horrifying, frightening, disturbing news scares?
Remember
when Russian Hackers took over C-Span? This was a big deal. Russia
Today took over C-Span's live feed for about 10 minutes. But...while
it did actually happen, it was the result of "an internal
routing error" by C-Span and had nothing to do with Russia,
Russian Hackers or Russia Today besides the fact that RT is what went
out over C-Span because of the "routing error." This
happened during the time they were preparing for inauguration
coverage. I’m sure this was a legitimate error made by the board
operator. (Bullshit!)
Remember
when the Russian Hackers took over the Electricity Grid for Vermont
and denied heat to U.S. citizens? The Washington Post broke this
story, just a couple of weeks before the inauguration. Eventually,
this scare and outrage story got diluted down to where it was a piece
of malware found on a laptop in no way connected
with the electrical grid of any U. S. state and had nothing to do
with Russia, Hackers or the election. Eventually, after scaring the
shit out of everyone for a week or so, the Washington Post retracted
the story because it was complete bullshit.
Remember
when CNN reported Anthony Scramucci was under Senate investigation
for being involved in a Russian Direct Investment Fund? It was a big
deal; a Trump aide directly associated with Russian money. Except, it
wasn't. He wasn't. And it was a made up lie. The three reporters for
CNN who "broke" that story, including one Pulitzer Prize
winner, were fired. CNN actually apologized to Mr. Scramucci. (Today,
I don't think they would even blink an eye at that kind of
fabrication. Don Lemon still has a show and all his "news"
is made-up bullshit.)
Remember
when NBC reported Russian spies attacked U.S. Diplomats at the Cuban
Embassy? And they used a sonic microwave superweapon to inflict
serious brain damage on U.S. personnel. It was a horrifying and
heinous act of war! Until, it wasn't. The whole thing turned out to
be a sham. The "brain injuries" were diagnosed by real
doctors (neurologists) as collective psychosomatic symptoms. And the
strange sounds these "Diplomats" heard leading up the brain
injuries was emitted by a common Caribbean cricket. Which is about
the same sounds we heard from the media once this was exposed as
complete bullshit.
Remember
when Slate broke the story of how a Trump organization server was
secretly communicating with a Russian bank? This was all the rage and
every liberal news organization spewed it with the hateful vitriol
only they can generate. And it was the smoking gun that was going to
bring out the Russian Collusion proof they all wanted so badly.
Except, it wasn't. Again, completely made-up bullshit.
(Anybody
else picking up on this pattern?)
Remember
when the Guardian broke the story of how Paul Manafort had visited
Julian Assange three times while he was a guest at the Ecuadorian
Embassy? The Guardian dropped this bombshell about Manafort sneaking
into one of the most surveilled buildings in the world. And, instead
of fact-checking, all the cable, air and online news outlets dove in
head first to expose the Trump/Assange/Russian Collusion connection
they all knew existed. Except, it didn't. This story went on for two
months without any other news organization ever confirming the
"facts." No photo, video or witness evidence ever surfaced.
Nor any apology or retraction. One Ecuadorian official from the
embassy called the story "a complete fake." You know,
made-up bullshit.
Remember
when CNN lied to everyone about NOT having as a source one of Michael
Cohen's attorneys who admitted to lying about how Cohen would testify
to Robert Mueller that President Trump knew in advance about the
infamous "Trump Tower meeting?" Wow, that was complicated
introduction. CNN finally admitted that their source was, in fact,
Lanny Davis, attorney to Michael Cohen. Davis, subsequently admitted
the whole thing was a lie. CNN has never retracted the story. Most
outlets stopped running with it once it was exposed as complete
bullshit.
Remember
when BuzzFeed reported that Robert Mueller possessed email and
witness testimony proving Trump Directed Michael Cohen to lie to
Congress? This was, again, the smoking gun all the Trump haters had
been waiting for. Except, it wasn't. It was such a blatant lie, that
even the hired gun of the liberal left Democratic asshats, Special
Counsel Robert Mueller, put out a statement saying that, basically,
it was bullshit.
Remember
when Congress appointed a Special Counsel to prove that Donald Trump
was elected with the help of Russian hackers changing election
results? Remember how CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC and every liberal media
owned outlet blabbered every day for two years about how this was
finally going to be the smoking gun that evicted Trump from the
Whitehouse? And, how could we forget the actual outcome? "No
evidence of collusion." Of course, the special counsel didn't
say he was not guilty. Only that he could find no evidence...after
two years and $32 million taxpayer dollars. All we got was bullshit.
Finally,
my favorite. Remember how CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC and every liberal
media-owned outlet crowed every day for a year that this was going to
be the year Hillary Clinton won the Presidency? Remember how they all
told us every day, that Hillary was as good as elected; that she had
an 80%, or 85%, or 90% lead over Donald Trump? Remember how those
lying bastards kept telling us that Trump was joke and Hillary was as
good as elected already? I remember it clearly. I also remember
driving from Little Rock to Detroit during that time and everywhere I
went, I saw 10 Trump/Pence signs for every one Hillary sign.
While
I had figured out many years ago that the media is controlled by the
CIA (look up Operation Mockingbird; it’s public domain), I
concluded the media was lying to me or they were incompetent. They
cannot be trusted to tell the truth. They bias their reports intentionally (you know, lie) or they're just too stupid to get it
right. Whatever the case; it’s all bullshit.
So,
where can we get truthful information? Where
can we get unbiased reporting? The answer is easy; nowhere. Not from
a single source. Not one single media outlet can be trusted.
Understand their history and their bias. Keep front and center the
fact that none of them are afraid to report a complete fabrication as
long as it makes President Trump look bad. Remember that they have an
agenda; they preach the Narrative. The Narrative is what you’re
supposed to believe.They want to direct your thoughts and actions to
follow the Narrative. (“Here’s
what you need to take away from the President’s speech.”)
The
mainstream media does not want you thinking on your own. Once you
understand these things, it’s easier to see the Alternate
Narrative.
Look
at all of the news outlets, as long as you understand their bias, and
make a decision based on your own experience and intuition.
However,
to be clear, if your intuition tells you Hillary Clinton was a good
pick for President, then you're jacked up worse than a soup sandwich.
Just
my opinion. No bullshit.
No comments:
Post a Comment