Joe Biden is a Political Prisoner: The Debate Showed Us the Truth
Apocalypse Watch News
I watched the first debate. I'm doubtful there'll be a second. The headline above says Joe Biden is a Political Prisoner. I’ll tell you why I think that in a minute. First, let’s lay some foundation.
The debate was held June 27, 2024. Never before seen ground rules were established almost entirely by the Biden camp and, as would be expected, clearly leaned the contest in Biden’s favor. Trump, for his part, said he didn’t care what they did, he’d debate whenever and wherever, but neither candidate could have an earpiece.
CNN Hosts: (Advantage Biden) Hosted by CNN anchors Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, both outspoken Trump haters. The hosts did manage to show some semblance of journalistic integrity, which hid some of their blatant favoritism. It's hilarious that in the aftermath of Biden's complete failure, the criminal media propaganda machine is bashing the hosts for not arguing with Trump. That's right: CNN is taking heat from the criminal media for not being biased enough.
Muted microphones: (Advantage Biden) The hosts had mute buttons to turn off the microphones of either candidate. My observations are that they were mostly fair. They did not censor or interrupt either candidate, only cutting off the feeds after warning that time was up. What the CNN hosts did do, and it was not even subtle, was cut Joe Biden’s mic when he went off the reservation or locked up with a glassy eyed, drug-addled stare.
Two breaks: (Advantage Biden) Requested by the Biden camp. Obviously to monitor and regulate the amphetamine cocktail, or whatever stimulant, running through Biden’s system. This was their effort to suppress Angry Joe and wake up Sleepy Joe, hoping to find some middle ground. It didn’t work.
The Questions: (Advantage Biden) Most of the questions were put to each candidate equally. However, Trump was asked several questions, not asked to Biden, that required him to defend himself. Most notably, would Trump accept the results of the 2024 election if he lost. Why wasn’t Biden asked the same question?
No Teleprompter, No Earpiece: (Advantage Trump) Known for going off-script, Trump had no issue with this rule. Biden, on the other hand, is on public video reading the teleprompter completely, including, "end of quote" on several occasions. Trump didn't need an earpiece to have experts and advisors yelling at him in the middle of the debate. Biden clearly needed it, and it showed. Conspiracy observation: Watch Biden's ink pen...why do you think he kept bringing it up close to his ear?
With all those advantages, everything else being equal, one would think Biden would be able to stand toe-to-toe with Trump. In reality, it wasn’t even close. The best Joe could do was spew a half dozen stale and debunked lies perpetuated by the criminal media. We got a rehash of the “losers and suckers” hoax; the “16 Nobel Economists” hoax; and the “very fine people” hoax, among others. Interesting that Biden didn’t bring up the “Russian Collusion” hoax. Probably because everything about that DOJ, criminal media clown rodeo now paints Trump as a victim rather than a villain. Or, maybe, because he just forgot.
That was the best Biden could do; rehash the same tired lies we've been hearing for years. I was going to write a description of Joe’s performance. I don’t need to. Just watch it; any part of it. You’ll immediately see why the Republicans are laughing their collective heads off and the Democrats are in the throes of an apoplectic brain seizure.
This dismal performance by Biden followed a full week of preparation at Camp David with coaches and advisors to get Joe ready to be on that stage. These people spent a week with Biden: They had to know how this was going to go. (Now, the Biden campaign is also blaming the coaches and advisors for his horrible performance.) Either Democrat leadership is so blind to what’s right in front of them they refuse to believe it, or they knew it and hoped the drugs would carry him through. Mostly, though, they absolutely knew about old Joe’s physical and cognitive condition, despite years of media lies, and chose to put him on that stage anyway. This was an act of desperation by a group of people who had nothing left to lose.
Message to Democrats: Your leadership, coaches and advisors, took a physically feeble, mentally impaired, elderly man and sent him onto a public stage to debate Donald Trump. Think about what kind of leaders those are that would do that to an obviously ill, elderly man. What kind of leaders would jeopardize their party’s chances of keeping the White House by putting Biden in that position knowing his condition. Your leaders did that. They did that to Joe; they did that you. If they’re so stupid, or short-sighted, or selfish, that they would subject an elderly man to such abuse, then maybe it’s time to rethink your leadership.
Now, why is Joe Biden a political prisoner? This is my take on it: I’d almost bet he didn’t want to go out there. He’s a prisoner of his own political party leadership. They’re in such disarray and scrambling for anything of substance that they wouldn’t let Joe back out. One look at the horrid gallery of possible Democrat replacements, (criminals, simpletons, morons, idiots, freaks) that they might pick to step in as the candidate and it’s easy to understand why they did it. Frighteningly, Joe's the best they have to offer. That doesn’t make what they did right.
The Dems took a big loss. The longer they hold Joe prisoner, the more they’ll lose. The Democrat party needs to let Joe go. Let him eat ice cream and watch Gilligan’s Island.
(John P. Smith is a military trained journalist living in northern Arkansas. He is host of the Apocalypse Watch and Johnny Watcher shows. Visit the website for more information and links to the most recent articles and podcasts. www.apocalypsewatch.news. Check out Conspiracy 101: Welcome to the Conspiratorium), available on Amazon as paperback or Kindle.)
2 comments:
An interesting and alluring reconstruction of what happened. There are to many questions that come up to try and list them as to why they are playing it like this. I am leaning towards the thought that they want to keep the conversation about the poor elderly gentleman and other DEI platitudes so we don’t have a chance to look at the core direction of each. We should be discussing what they ( both dides) plan to do to/for America. By putting hime out there, they had the opportunity to call Trump a bully. However, he didn’t bite. They were successful in keeping the conversation off of the failed strategies they run and even moreso, why they insist on so many that destroy us.
Yes. Who is controlling Biden and why all the destructive policies are good questions. Books can (and will) be written on those subjects. This article was singularly focused on my thoughts about the debate debacle. I touched on the why and who, but those need to be covered in other articles.
Post a Comment