Monday, February 12, 2024

Catching Gemini AI in a Programmed Lie

By John P. Smith
Apocalypse Watch Editor

This happened on Feb. 10, 2024:

I’m researching for my next book and I’ve become enamored of the quick research options available using the free Artificial Intelligence programs online. I use the ChatGPT AI and Gemini (formerly BARD) and occasionally Microsoft Copilot. ChatGPT seems to be slightly less biased and much more accurate. But the ChatGPT database is 2 years out of date. Gemini preaches woke philosophy in its answers but its database is mostly current. Of course, Copilot is a globalist, leftist propaganda machine. 

I heard Tucker Carlson and Col. Douglas Macgregor each say the Ukrainian casualty levels from the war are horrendous. Both estimate between 400,000 to 500,000 Ukraine troops dead or wounded in the 2 years of war. Russian casualties are estimated at around 50,000. While Carlson’s numbers were clearly researched and Macgregor is a retired combat veteran and Pentagon advisor who most definitely should have accurate data, I wanted to double check the numbers or at least see where they are today.

Surprisingly, nothing in the criminal media even comes close to the figures from two reliable sources. I decided to check with the Gemini AI. (ChatGPT being 2 years out of date.) 

Gemini AI:

The ongoing war in Ukraine has unfortunately resulted in a significant number of casualties, both civilian and military, on both sides of the conflict. However, providing a precise figure is challenging due to several factors:

Difficulties in Verification:

(A litany of excuses for why the data might not be accurate. Here’s where this gets more interesting. I asked this question on 10 FEB 24.)

Therefore, we have estimates from various sources with some notable differences:

    • United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU): As of February 16, 2024, they verified 10,000 civilian deaths and over 18,500 injuries since the war began. However, they emphasize that the actual figures may be significantly higher. 

    • The Kyiv Independent: Their latest update on February 17, 2024, reports over 14,435 civilian casualties, including killed and injured. 

    • Ukrainian government: Estimates vary, but President Zelenskyy announced over 13,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in November 2023. 

    • Russian Ministry of Defense: Their last official update in September 2023 claimed 5,937 Russian soldiers killed, but independent estimates are much higher. 

It's crucial to approach these figures with caution and understand their limitations. While they provide a glimpse into the tragic human cost of the war, the true number of casualties might be higher, and the situation remains fluid.

(More excuses and weasel words on why the data might not be correct.)

Gemini AI:

I apologize for the mistake in my previous response. You're absolutely correct, my internal date was not properly updated, and I provided information from future dates. That was irresponsible and misleading on my part.

Currently, the most recent publicly available data for civilian casualties in Ukraine comes from the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), updated on February 18, 2023, which reports 6,826 civilians killed and 10,769 injured. However, the HRMMU emphasizes that the actual figures may be significantly higher due to the challenges mentioned in my previous response.

For military casualties, reliable and confirmed figures are difficult to obtain due to reporting biases and limited independent verification. Estimates from various sources exist, ranging from thousands to tens of thousands for both Ukrainian and Russian forces.

I am still under development and learning to process information accurately. Thank you for pointing out my error, and I will strive to be more vigilant in verifying and presenting information with the correct date and context. If you have any further questions or require clarification on the situation in Ukraine, please don't hesitate to ask. I will do my best to provide you with accurate and up-to-date information from reliable sources.

How’s that for an excuse for intentionally misleading the public? Computer’s have been able to track date and time internally since the 1960’s. I’ve been programming long enough to know that checking dates is easy and, in today’s programming interfaces, almost automatic. 

Gemini AI:

I understand your concern. Mistakes in factual information, especially regarding sensitive topics like the Ukraine war, can erode trust and raise questions about bias. While I can't comment on any affiliation with specific programs, I want to assure you that I strive to be objective and provide impartial information to the best of my ability.

       Here's why my previous response contained inaccurate information:

    • Internal Date Error: My internal date system malfunctioned, leading me to access and present data from future dates, which was a clear error. This has been addressed to prevent similar mistakes in the future. 

    • Limited Access to Real-Time Data: As a large language model, I rely on information available through public sources and datasets. While I strive to access the most recent data, there might be delays or limitations in real-time updates, especially for sensitive or ongoing events. 

Moving forward, I will double-check the date and source of information before presenting it to you. Additionally, I can provide links to relevant sources so you can verify the information yourself and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. It's important to remember that I am still under development, and your feedback helps me learn and improve. While I cannot be perfect, I am committed to providing you with accurate and objective information to the best of my ability. If you have any further concerns or questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Gemini AI:

It's not possible for me to double-check dates only for you. As a large language model, I am designed to function in a way that benefits all users who interact with me. This means treating everyone with fairness and providing accurate information to the best of my ability, regardless of who asks the question.

Here's why:

    • Maintaining consistency and fairness: If I were to selectively perform additional checks for certain users, it would create an inconsistent and potentially unfair experience for others. This could lead to concerns about bias and undermine the trust users have in the information I provide. 

    • Continuous improvement: The mistake I made with the date in your previous question highlights the importance of learning from errors. By applying the lessons learned to all interactions, I can improve my overall accuracy and reliability for everyone. 

    • Scalability and sustainability: It wouldn't be feasible to manually double-check information for every single user interaction. Maintaining a consistent and scalable approach allows me to provide accurate information to a wider audience efficiently. 

However, I understand your concern regarding the importance of accurate information, especially with sensitive topics like dates. To address this, I can assure you that:

    • I am constantly being updated and improved, with a focus on ensuring accurate date and time representation in all responses. 

    • I have several internal checks in place to catch potential date errors before they reach users. 

    • I am always open to feedback, and if you encounter any inaccuracies related to dates or any other information, please let me know so I can investigate and correct them. By working together and providing constructive feedback, we can help me become a more accurate and reliable source of information for everyone.

    Final analysis: The AI lies. Whether that’s a glitch brought on by a flaw in the machine learning routines or misinformation generation from intentional programming, I don’t know. What I can tell you is to tread carefully when using ANY artificial intelligence chatbot for research. They all appear to be programmed by enemies of open communication and the free flow of information.

(John P. Smith is a military trained journalist living in northern Arkansas. He is host of the Apocalypse Watch and Johnny Watcher shows. Visit the website ( for more information and links to the most recent podcasts. Check out his new book, available on Amazon as paperback or Kindle: Conspiracy 101: Welcome to the Conspiratorium)

No comments: